Saturday, February 28, 2015

the future of blogging

Dammit Blogger...

So this week I received the following message from Google:

"Dear Blogger User,

We're writing to tell you about an upcoming change to the Blogger Content Policy that may affect your account.

In the coming weeks, we'll no longer allow blogs that contain sexually explicit or graphic nude images or video. We'll still allow nudity presented in artistic, educational, documentary, or scientific contexts, or where there are other substantial benefits to the public from not taking action on the content.

The new policy will go into effect on the 23rd of March 2015. After this policy goes into effect, Google will restrict access to any blog identified as being in violation of our revised policy. No content will be deleted, but only blog authors and those with whom they have expressly shared the blog will be able to see the content we've made private.

Our records indicate that your account may be affected by this policy change. Please refrain from creating new content that would violate this policy. Also, we ask that you make any necessary changes to your existing blog to comply as soon as possible, so that you won't experience any interruptions in service. You may also choose to create an archive of your content via Google Takeout (https://www.google.com/settings/takeout/custom/blogger).

For more information, please read here (https://support.google.com/blogger?p=policy_update).

Sincerely,
The Blogger Team"

I thought, initially- that maybe I could just delete a few pics... No doubt I've embraced nudity, but the nudity on my blog is mostly artistic, educational, and in the context of science after all. Perhaps I could just remove the pics of spanked bottoms where the lady's lips were peeking out, or something. In the past, when given privacy concerns, I've even made my blog private myself for awhile- which is the "stick" bloggers are being threatened with if their content is deemed explicit and graphic.  But then, come to find out, almost every spanking blogger had received the same notice. We're not making money from writing these blogs- in fact it's something that started as a hobby and is still occasionally rewarding but has become almost a burden... perhaps it's time to give it up.

Nah... fuck it. And fuck those censoring fuckers at Google (who now owns blogger) for censoring content.  "Please refrain..." How about a link to perhaps the most offensive, yet still humorous (to me) site on the internet: Efuckt.com has videos of porno fails.  Take that.  

(Okay so I'm a weenie- I'll mention how the Charlie Hebdo magazine cover showed a cartoon depiction of Muhammad as a limp dick but won't actually include the cover in my post, and I'll post a link but not a video to failed porno scenes most of which involve either premature ejaculation or a young girl discovering that anal is not for her.)

But this whole controversy got me thinking... I've said for awhile that blogging in the traditional format was slowly dying, but I think there's something to be said for individual bloggers writing what they want to write about, and readers reading it... or not.  I read an interesting article recently about the death of blogging and how it would be replaced with Medium (a site started by the same team that originally created Blogger and then Twitter, so eventually it will probably be a big deal.) The premise of the article was that even in a new format, eventually stories would be author-driven and in a most recent post first format that would resemble traditional blogs.  But I looked on Medium and searched for spanking, and at this point, there's very little there.  So in the next few weeks I'll reluctantly join my fellow spanking bloggers in switching to wordpress for now.  Once that's done I'll post an announcement and it will be my final post on this blog.  But for now, I feel like at least there should be an explanation and condemnation of blogger and the parent company of Google for creating this pain in the ass.

Saturday, February 21, 2015

i'm still here

So I missed the whole 50 Shades of Grey thing and Valentines Day... a couple of good reasons to blog about my thoughts on both.  Dang.
Oh well.
I'm still here.  Here's a link to a post of an interview of me- I feel bad I haven't updated the blog in case readers of that interview wanted to check mine out... Oh Well.

Here's something curious that happened with my blog -

No idea what that was... Some pic on my blog gained a bit of momentary internet fame.  I've been busy with my job and my family and any extra late night time by myself on the internet has been devoted more toward NCAA basketball than spanking. Sorry.  I'll be back. Promise.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

The official color of 2015 is well-spanked-ass pink

Happy New Year everyone. I admit I took a break from my naughty internet habits to be with my family and extended family. I hope you did too, if only to remember why it's good to have your extended family live a ways away!

I bet you didn't know, but yes, there's an official color of the year. For 2015, the official color is well-spanked-ass pink. Seriously. Okay so maybe it's officially called "Marsala" an earthy dark pink. Some international conglomerate decided that this would be the official color of the year.  For those of you that don't know what color "Marsala" is well, here you go...
Insert your own caption, but here's mine... "Oh Hi Honey! I just got off work and am making dinner... for the hot sultry babysitter who's sitting on the counter next to me- and our kids. yes, our kids... corndogs and chicken nuggets, coming right up!"

I realize it will take awhile for this fashion trend to make it from London and Paris and New York and Hollywood to my little city in Texas, and I'm okay with that. I'm just glad we've moved away from gray and neon. Speaking of gray, err... Grey... yes, that movie's coming out just in time for Valentines Day, so maybe it's appropriate that the color of the year reminds me of nothing more than well-spanked-ass pink.  And as I've said before in extolling the virtues of red vs. pink, I'm glad it's a darker shade of pink- thank goodness it's Marsala, not White Zinfandel pink!
I waited tables in the early 90's... lots of women feeling adventurous ordered a "white Zin" with their meal
So how about some "Marsala" colored bottoms? Courtesy of DreamsofSpanking, dallasspankshard.com, realspankings.com, punishedbrats.comfirmhand.com, and one unknown pic, I think they each represent the official color of 2015 well; I'm sure that's what they were trying to do:

PS... thoughts and prayers go out to the families of the victims of terrorist attacks in France. I'm amused that despite the media coverage, few have pointed out that the intentionally offensive satirical magazine's cover depicts not just a cartoon version of Mohammed, but one of him as a flaccid penis.

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Update on Kardashians getting spanked- forgot to include Kendall Jenner! (and exploring her possible motivations for recently posing getting spanked - hint - British porn censorship related)

Recently stumbled across another image of a Kardashian (well, sort of... their half sister) getting spanked, and thought I should post a follow up to my last post
Geez, has it really been since Nov. 17th that I've posted something?! It turns out the image above was from a short video posted as a type of naughty advent calendar type thing provided as a treat by Love Magazine. (Her little video was the treat for December 8th.) Perhaps Kendall saw my earlier post containing pics of her half sisters getting spanked and was jealous, and wanted to be included in the naughty fun! 

However, in researching this post, I discovered that appears not to be the case.  As it turns out, not long before I posted that, Kendall turned 19 on Nov. 3rd. And Fox news joined in recounting how she got a birthday spanking from a stripper. Turns out TMZ obtained a brief video of her getting whacked on the butt with a "policeman's" baton.

So I was just remiss in not including this in my post about Kardashians getting spanked a little over a week after it happened.

It made me ponder about her motivations again. I figure there are a few possibilities:
A) She read my post and thought "Gosh I was just in the news last week for getting spanked, what else do I have to do to get noticed by Secretspanko on his blog?!"
B) She has no earthly idea about this blog, but kinda got excited when the cop stripper spanked her and, a budding spanko, wanted to try it again. (Not likely, but far more likely than "A")
C) She thought she'd capitalize on her recent publicity for getting spanked and turn it up a notch in an attempt to gain even more publicity. (more likely still)
D) Perhaps a bit of combining "C" with a tweak or a wink at the recent British ban on certain online porn activities, including spanking. 

I'd sure like to hope the correct answer is D.

Wait, what?? Yup. See, Love Magazine is a British publication.

For those that don't know, this month the British government banned producers in that country from filming several sexual acts in online content available to purchase. Among those acts banned- facesitting, squirting, fisting, and uhm... spanking and caning. The discussion of this is way more in depth than I can do justice to here. I urge you to go to Pandora Blake's blog. She has an extensive discussion on the ban, and its ramifications. And a tip of the hat to her for pointing out the photo at the top which led to this post. The little video and brief spanking scene were published post ban. Perhaps Love Magazine is in support of Pandora, and others like her, affected by it. Or maybe rather than make a political statement, they're just trying to capitalize on the media attention and get some more publicity.

P.S. I'm pleased that both Dreams of Spanking (Pandora's site) and Spanking Sarah, two websites I've enjoyed have said they will continue to produce spanking content, despite the ban.

P.P.S. Sorry, but I have to get this off my chest.  I've been plenty critical of Republicans and Fox News here in the past but going back to my philosophical and political roots... I saw the topic come up in a discussion on Fetlife and the point was made about how surprised some were that the U.K. was that culturally conservative.  This is probably a reflection of my own politics, but I don't think it was a result of being politically culturally conservative at all. This was a pointless and micromanaging regulation imposed without any electoral input (much less cost/benefit analysis or foresight) by an out of control bureaucracy - in other words, a failure of liberalism.

Monday, November 17, 2014

Kardashians spanked

Even if it didn't quite break the internet, Kim Kardashian's recent nude photo shoot caused quite a stir.  Not gonna lie- I thought they were hot. I love curves. But you know what? They'd have been maybe even sexier if they'd been more realistic.
photoshopped wasp on the left, re-photoshopped vision of what she really looks like on the right
Am I alone here? In the pictures above, one looks normal, the other looks like an alien creature.
No, that's not what I meant. The Kardashians (as opposed to the Star Trek Cardassians) have a genetic disposition for being blessed with an ample booty.

Okay so setting that question aside, I can't be the only one that want to spank that delicious bottom, am I? A quick google search reveals that I'm not.
Perhaps this isn't the same Kardashian- I get them confused, but she has the same genetic disposition.
And a closer shot makes it look like she's enjoying it:
And you know what? There are a few more interesting images... here are "butt" a few:
So Kanye, you're a lucky man.
And so are you, Lamar Odom, Miles Austin, Reggie Bush, some stupid tv show host I've never heard of, another Kardashian, etc... I think every spanko in America would love to smack that bottom, or turn a Kardashian over our knee, or at least I would- photoshopped ideal or not.